| Cosmologically |
|
|
|
|
Cosmologically
In my childhood I was told:
Ubhayatra Sadasat Samanvayah
But I did not understand it. I again asked my great grand maternal father if Brahma was real (saŤ) then how can (could) it be unreal (asaŤ) at the same time. He explained me and I pretended to have understood it. But infact I did not.
During my graduation, after about 10-11 years of that incident of saŤ and asaŤ Brahma, I was studying Pair – Production in quantum physics. And the concept of saŤ and asaŤ Brahma was more than clear to me. Now I could acualize the meaninglessness of distinction of "Bieng" and the "Potential of Being". Now I could see the "Being" (saŤ) and the "Potential of Being" (asaŤ) as the extension of the same existence. This was once again I realized the fallacy created by some people and thereby declaring sciences and religions as essentially being in an ever pervading conflicting mode. If this universe is composed of small particles then each particle is a window to look into the details of the Universe. The quantum physics says it so. How it says so would be discussed later in the articles of the Article Hub. One such article is “Mediocre Minds Plead Reason the Higher Ones Transcend It”. Religion says that it is not the Universe. It is merely a universe amongst countless Universes. It says if a window of a single particle can lead to the truths of one Universe then it can further lead you to some other super Universe of net Totality of the Existence. The number system may become redundant to describe that totality of the existence. Many a people call it a conflict between the sciences and the religions but I call it an intermediary stage of development of ever-developing sciences. Sciences are likely to take still more time to grasp religion in objective and communicable terms. In the present world on one hand is the theory of Braham Satyam Jagat Mithya while on the other hand there are target fixations and their achievements on a corporate horizon. But it is again the same thing which I indicated elsewhere whether you perceive to have a participation or participate to make a perception.
But it is merely your perception; perception of this Ontological and Cosmological process. However, this process does not need one’s perception to proceed. Rather it proceeds as Guru Saheb Nanak Dev Ji realized rightly – आप्पै आप Appai Aap (by itself, suo moto). Let us surrender to this process which is flowing Appai Aap cosmologically. |
Cosmologically





